World Literature
2403/26
Professor Kiefer
Spring 2015
Analytic Paper:
For this course you will be required to write
one 5-7 page paper outside of class, of a minimum 1500 words in length. Minimum
paper lengths are so extremely short that anyone desiring a high grade would be
advised to write a somewhat longer one. Any paper shorter than the minimum
assigned will receive an F as an incomplete assignment. Except for meeting the
very low minimum number of pages, don't concentrate on length, but try to make
your papers as detailed, well-organized, and interesting as possible. All
papers must be shared with me via Google Docs since I will be grading,
commenting and returning them to you electronically. You MUST send an email to
be indicating the paper is complete with an accompanying link provided. Please
click on “allow to edit.” These papers are not necessarily research papers, and
it is possible to receive an A on a paper without doing research for them,
although good papers, incorporating good library work, will normally receive
higher grades.
You
should choose a topic you are particularly interested in, not try to guess what
I want you to write. When I can learn something new from a paper, I am pleased.
By Tuesday, April 1, you will send me a proposal briefly describing the
thesis of your paper. This should include the scope and focus of your
paper. I t should be a minimum of one paragraph. If necessary I will give you
advice on how to proceed. I am happy to answer questions about proposed topics.
Papers are to be submitted to gotprofkiefer@gmail.com by noon on Thursday April 24,
Papers may always be handed in before the due date if you wish.
Prompt:
Create a 5-7
page (1500-1800 words) term paper comparing and/or contrasting a common thematic
element(s) in two of the pieces of literature we have read thus far: Antigone, The Odyssey, Macbeth, The
Stranger and The Death of Ivan Ilyich. This essay requires a close reading
and analysis of the texts. You may create your own topic or consider one of the
following: loyalty, fidelity, vision vs. blindness, the use of disguise, pride
and stubbornness, what it means to be a hero, etc. You
are relatively free to choose your topic, as long as it analyzes thematic
elements common in both pieces you
choose. This essay should not be a summary of the material, but a critical analysis
of the material. Be original, but be
sure that your claims are supported by evidence from the texts.
Assessment:
The
following elements are taken into consideration when I grade your papers:
1) You
must convince me that you have closely read and understood the texts.
2) You
must have sent me your thesis to review by noon on Thursday April 2.
3) You
must respond to the prompt as given.
4) You
must follow the Kean University Composition guidelines (attached on rubric)
5) I
expect you to support your arguments with references to the text, often
including quotations appropriately introduced and analyzed (but quote only to
make points about the material quoted, not simply for its own sake).
6) Your
paper must be sent electronically in the format described above to Gotprofkiefer@gmail.com by noon on Thursday April 24.
Late
Papers:
If you
think you have a valid excuse (medical, etc.) for not getting a paper in on
time, let me know in advance via e-mail at gotprofkiefer@gmail.com. Papers
handed in late with no excuse will not receive a passing grade. To pass the
course you must hand in this paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment